注释
[1][5]刘永谋、张寻：《卡尔纳普哲学思想的政治意涵》，《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》，2019年第2期。
[2][6][35][84]Cartwright N.; Cat J.; Fleck L.; Uebel E. T. and Neurath O., Philosophy Between Science and Politics, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 78, 1, 2, 182.
[3][8][19]Symons J. and Pombo O., Torres M. J. (eds), Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science, London, New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 2, 4, 13-30.
[4][10][91]M. W.瓦托夫斯基、岳长龄：《维也纳学派和社会运动》，《哲学译丛》，1985年第2期。
[7][11][14][16][18][24][28][38][41][51][56][57][60][63][64][67][68][76][82][83][87][88][89][90]Neurath O., Empiricism and Sociology, Neurath M. and Cohen S. R. (eds), Dordrecht Holland, Boston USA: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1973, pp. 43-44, 383-388, 423, 403, 100-103, 325, 325, 123-124, 130-131, 137, 422, 138, 403, 151, 424, 427, 138, 363, 45, 361, 350, 291, 382, 426.
[9]Wasserman J., Vienna B. and Vienna R., "the Struggle for Intellectual and Political Hegemony in Interwar Vienna, 1918-1938", Washington University in Saint Louis, May 2010, pp. 132-142.
[12]O.纽拉特、王玉北：《科学的世界观：维也纳小组——献给石里克》，《哲学译丛》，1994年第1期。
[13][17][20][22][29][31][32][33][71][74][75]Neurath O., Philosophical Papers 1913-1946, Dordracht, Holland: D. Reidel Publising Company, 1983, pp. 34-35, 30, 46, 55, 53-54, 58, 203-204, 242, 239, 56, 71.
[15][21][25][27][30][69][70][73][77]［奥］奥托·纽拉特：《社会科学基础》，杨富斌、李志江译，北京：华夏出版社，1999年，第30、110、4、25、117、47、44、119、60页。
[23][26][37][44][45][46][47]Neurath O. (eds), Kaal H. (trans), Unified Science, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987; Neurath O., Unified Science and Psychology, 1932, pp. 3, 3, xix, 72, 75, 76, 93-94.
[34]Sarkar S. and Pfeifer J. (eds), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, New York, London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 848-849.
[36]Carnap R. and Neurath O., etc, "International Encyclopedia of Unified Science", Science, New Series, Vol.86, No.2235, 1937, pp. 400-401.
[39]刘永谋：《“技术人员的苏维埃”：凡勃伦技治主义思想述评》，《自然辩证法通讯》，2014年第1期。
[40][42][48][49][50][52][53][54][55][58][59][61][62][65][66][72]Neurath O., Economic Writings Selections 1904-1945, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005, pp. 257, 361, 350, 347-348, 402, 367, 426, 406, 384, 358, 360, 539, 395, 301, 367, 536-537.
[43]刘永谋：《高能社会的科学运行：斯科特技术治理思想述评》，《科学技术哲学研究》，2019年第1期。
[78]Uebel E. T. (eds), Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle: Austrian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht, Bosoton, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, p. 9.
[79]刘永谋：《技术治理、反治理与再治理：以智能治理为例》，《云南社会科学》，2019年第2期。
[80]T.于贝尔、殷杰：《早期逻辑经验主义中的社会科学哲学——激进物理主义的情况》，《世界哲学》，2011年第5期。
[81]刘永谋：《论波普尔渐进的社会工程》，《科学技术哲学研究》，2017年第1期。
[85]Zilsel E., The Social Origins of Modern Science, Dordracht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2003, p. ix.
[86]Gruber H., Red Vienna: Experiment in Working-Class Culture, 1919-1934, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 4-7.
责 编／桂 琰
刘永谋，中国人民大学哲学院教授、博导。研究方向为科学技术哲学、科技与公共政策。主要著作有《福柯的主体解构之旅:从知识考古学到“人之死”》、《技术的反叛》、《行动中的密涅瓦——当代认知活动的权力之维》、《自主创新与建设创新型国家导论》（编著）等。
On Neurath's Thought of Technocracy
Liu Yongmou
Abstract: The Vienna School is not confined to the ivory tower, but actively participates in the progressive social practice, of which Neurath is the representative. As a technocrat, he not only put forward the theory of technological governance, but also actively provided relevant measures. From the perspective of technological governance, the scientific world outlook and unified science have laid the epistemological and methodological foundation for technological governance. The ultimate goal of Neurath's technocracy is to realize the transformation to the real economy and socialism, and the means of realization is socialization and complete socialization. Among the technological governance strategies discussed by Neurath, making plans, especially economic plans, is the most important. The emphasis on planning also determines the important position of engineers and social sciences in technological governance. Neurath is a representative of logical positivist technocrats. His thought of technocracy has distinctive characteristics different from other technocrats and is of great value to the construction of a new technological governance theory.
Keywords: Neurath, technological governance, technocracy, logical positivism
